These newer fields have some deep connections with quantitative population ethology.

• P Bak, M Paczuski (1995) Complexity, contingency, and criticality. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 92: 6689-6696. Paper | JSTOR has enhanced Figure 3
• KE Bassler, M Paczuski, GF Reiter (1999) Braided rivers and superconducting vortex avalanches. Phys Rev Lett 83: 3956-3959. Paper
• JM Carlson, J Doyle (2002) Complexity and robustness. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99 Suppl. 1: 2538-2545. Paper
• ME Csete, JC Doyle (2002) Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science 295: 1664-1669. Paper
• RB Laughlin, D Pines (2000) From the cover: the theory of everything. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97: 28-31. Paper
• L Ma, PA Iglesias (2002) Quantifying robustness of biochemical network models. BMC Bioinformatics 3: 38-51. Paper

• M Paczuski, P Bak (1999) Self-organization of complex systems. Proceedings of 12th Chris Engelbrecht Summer School. Paper

  Figure 2

• M Paczuski, S Maslov, P Bak (1996) Avalanche dynamics in evolution, growth, and depinning models. Phys Rev E 53: 414-443. Paper
• T Yoshida, LE Jones, SP Ellner, GF Fussmann, NG Hairston Jr (2003) Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey model. Nature 424: 303-306. Paper
• DL Turcotte, JB Rundle (2002) Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99 Suppl. 1: 2463-2465. Paper
• DR White (200x) The controversy over SOC (self-organized criticality) vs. HOT and other models that generate ubiquitous power-laws. Web Page
• L Wolfenstein (2003) Lessons from Kepler and the theory of everything. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100: 5001-5003. Paper

• T Zhou, JM Carlson, J Doyle (2002) Mutation, specialization, and hypersensitivity in highly optimized tolerance. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99: 2049-2054. Paper

• Jean M Carlson, Complex Systems, Dept of Physics, UCSB
• John Doyle, Control and Dynamical Systems, Caltech
• Pablo A Iglesias, ECE, Johns Hopkins U
• Robert B. Laughlin
• Maya Paczuski, Maths, Imperial College, London